Cryptocurrency Tax Language in Infrastructure Bill
But crypto advocates have been fighting to revamp the proposal because they said the bill’s definition of who counts as a broker was so sweeping that it would sweep in numerous unintended targets, including software engineers.
They have also warned the legislation would give the IRS too
much authority to demand additional information when people transfer assets out
of brokerages.
“Digital assets are here to stay,” Lummis said in a
statement. “While much more work needs to be done; this amendment is a
responsible step toward fully incorporating digital assets into the U.S.
financial sector.”
Toomey said in statement: “While Congress works to better
understand and legislate on issues surrounding the development and transaction
of cryptocurrencies, it should be wary of imposing burdensome regulations that
may stifle innovation. Click here for more information: Top Cryptocurrency Prices Today
By clarifying the definition of broker, our amendment will
ensure nonfinancial intermediaries like miners, network validators, and other
service providers many of whom don’t even have the personal identifying
information needed to file a 1099 with the IRS are not subject to the reporting
requirements specified in the bipartisan infrastructure package.”
Clarifying the provision to address our concerns would not
affect the reporting requirements on crypto exchanges that operate on behalf of
customers,” the Blockchain Association, Coinbase, Coin Center, Ribbit Capital,
and Square said in a joint statement.
A spokesperson for Sen. Rob Portman (ROhio), who helped write the legislation,
has argued that it would not force nonbrokers, such as software developers and
crypto miners, to comply with IRS reporting obligations.
Comments
Post a Comment